French v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.
This text of 92 F. 28 (French v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a cross bill filed by the defendant the Union Pacific Railway Company in the original cause, decided upon the demurrer of the receivers to restrain a multiplicity of suits upon the guaranties, which has heen heard on demurrer. 92 Fed. 26. The defendant does not admit that the two suits already brought are sufficient, so far as proceedings at law may be required, for reaching equitable assets; nor that valid judgments by some would be sufficient for all. The plaintiffs cannot properly be restrained from taking such steps as may be necessary to reach equitable assets, if any such should come within reach. No equitable ground for maintaining this bill is, in any view, made to appear. Demurrer sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 F. 28, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-union-pac-ry-co-nysd-1899.