French v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

French v. State

687 So. 2d 206, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 210, 1996 WL 479512

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedAugust 23, 1996

DocketCR-94-410

StatusPublished

This text of 687 So. 2d 206 (French v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

French v. State, 687 So. 2d 206, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 210, 1996 WL 479512 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

TAYLOR, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte French, 687 So.2d 205 (Ala.Cr.App.1996), the judgment is reversed in part and this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. As the Supreme Court stated in its opinion: “We remand the case for the Court of Criminal Appeals to direct that the defendant be resentenced without consideration of the second Georgia conviction.” Due return should be filed in this court no later than 42 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

TAYLOR, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion in Ex parte French, 687 So.2d 205 (Ala.Cr.App.1996), the judgment is reversed in part and this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. As the Supreme Court stated in its opinion: “We remand the case for the Court of Criminal Appeals to direct that the defendant be resentenced without consideration of the second Georgia conviction.” Due return should be filed in this court no later than 42 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

687 So. 2d 206, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 210, 1996 WL 479512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-state-alacrimapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack