French v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 11, 2006·No. 06-6067·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6067

AARON LITTLE FRENCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH V. SMITH; KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER; ROBERT WILSON; J. WADE; L. GUEVARA-ROSARIO; A. MOLINA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:04-cv-21915-MBS)

Submitted: March 31, 2006 Decided: April 11, 2006

Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Little French, Appellant Pro Se. Christie Newman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Aaron Little French appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation, granting

Respondents’ motion to dismiss, and denying relief on his Bivens

complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See French v. Smith, No. 6:04-cv-21915-MBS (D.S.C.

Dec. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

French v. Smith, (4th Cir. 2006).

French v. Smith (French v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related