French v. Shotwell

20 Johns. 668
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedNovember 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 20 Johns. 668 (French v. Shotwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
French v. Shotwell, 20 Johns. 668 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

November 13th. The. Court, (Vielie, senator, alone dissentingi) being of opinion, that the decree of the Court of Chancery ought to be affirmed, the following decree was entered: “ Counsel having been heard in this cause, and due deliberation being thereupon had, it is ordered, adjijdged, and decreed, that the decrees of the Court of Chancery, in this cause, be apirmed, and that the appeal 6e dismissed; and that the appellants pay to the respondent jdg costs, in defending this appeal, to be taxed, and that the 3 e 0 * * record be remitted," &c.

Decree of affirmande.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forker v. Brown
30 N.Y.S. 827 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Kelly v. Town of Milan
21 F. 842 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1884)
Yardley v. New York Guaranty & Indemnity Co.
30 F. Cas. 785 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee, 1876)
Conklin v. Furman
8 Abb. Pr. 161 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)
Bell v. Woodward
42 N.H. 181 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)
Holmes v. Rogers
13 Cal. 191 (California Supreme Court, 1859)
Shufelt v. Shufelt
9 Paige Ch. 137 (New York Court of Chancery, 1841)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Johns. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-shotwell-nycterr-1822.