French v. Seneca Falls Little League

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

French v. Seneca Falls Little League

31 A.D.2d 782, 296 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4767

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 782 (French v. Seneca Falls Little League) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

French v. Seneca Falls Little League, 31 A.D.2d 782, 296 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts to the extent of granting a new .trial on the question of damages only, and as so modified judgment affirmed, with costs to appellant. Memorandum: We find the amount of the jury verdict for the split and separated retina injury sustained by the infant inadequate under the facts presented in the record. In .the interest of justice the damages should be reassessed at a new trial at which the only issue to be resolved should be the amount of damages to be awarded plaintiff. (Appeal from judgment of Seneca Trial Term in a negligence action.) Present — Bastow, P. J., Goldman, Del Veechio, Witmer and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts to the extent of granting a new .trial on the question of damages only, and as so modified judgment affirmed, with costs to appellant. Memorandum: We find the amount of the jury verdict for the split and separated retina injury sustained by the infant inadequate under the facts presented in the record. In .the interest of justice the damages should be reassessed at a new trial at which the only issue to be resolved should be the amount of damages to be awarded plaintiff. (Appeal from judgment of Seneca Trial Term in a negligence action.) Present — Bastow, P. J., Goldman, Del Veechio, Witmer and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 782, 296 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-seneca-falls-little-league-nyappdiv-1969.