French v. Putnam

14 La. 97
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 La. 97 (French v. Putnam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
French v. Putnam, 14 La. 97 (La. 1839).

Opinion

Rost, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The defendants and appellants have assigned as errors apparent upon the face of the record: That a judgment by default, taken in this case, was made final, after it had been set aside, and they had answered to the merits, and prayed for a trial by jury. .

. The error exists, and in our opinion vitiates the proceedings. The cause should have been tried by jury, contradictorily, with the defendants; and it must be remanded for that purpose.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the Parish Court be avoided and reversed, and the case remanded, to be proceeded in according to law ; the plaintiff and appellee paying the costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington v. Comeau
1 McGl. 234 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1881)
Hasam v. McVittie
1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 192 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 La. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-putnam-la-1839.