French v. People

Illinois Supreme Court

French v. People

77 Ill. 531

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedJune 15, 1875

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 77 Ill. 531 (French v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

French v. People, 77 Ill. 531 (Ill. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This was an indictment for selling spirit-

uous liquors in a less quantity than one gallon, contrary to the form of the statute. On the trial, defendant was found guilty on three counts, and the court assessed a fine against him of $10 and costs on each count. Defendant excepted to the judgment, and prayed an appeal to the Supreme Court, which was allowed by the circuit court. His exceptions were preserved in a bill of exceptions, signed and sealed by the judge, and subsequently an appeal bond was filed.

Exceptions may be taken in criminal cases, and bills of exceptions shall be signed and sealed by the judge, and entered of record, and error may be assigned thereon by the defendant the same as in civil cases. R. S. 1874, p. 411, sec. 437. But no provision seems to be made for an appeal, and unless there is some statute expressly allowing it, no appeal, it is apprehended, will lie. A writ of error is the only mode by which the case can be brought before this court.

The people are not bound to follow the appeal. Had there been an appearance or joinder in error on behalf of the people, we might, perhaps, treat the case as pending on error,, and take it for decision, but there has been neither an appearance nor a joinder in error, and hence the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This was an indictment for selling spirit-

uous liquors in a less quantity than one gallon, contrary to the form of the statute. On the trial, defendant was found guilty on three counts, and the court assessed a fine against him of $10 and costs on each count. Defendant excepted to the judgment, and prayed an appeal to the Supreme Court, which was allowed by the circuit court. His exceptions were preserved in a bill of exceptions, signed and sealed by the judge, and subsequently an appeal bond was filed.

Exceptions may be taken in criminal cases, and bills of exceptions shall be signed and sealed by the judge, and entered of record, and error may be assigned thereon by the defendant the same as in civil cases. R. S. 1874, p. 411, sec. 437. But no provision seems to be made for an appeal, and unless there is some statute expressly allowing it, no appeal, it is apprehended, will lie. A writ of error is the only mode by which the case can be brought before this court.

The people are not bound to follow the appeal. Had there been an appearance or joinder in error on behalf of the people, we might, perhaps, treat the case as pending on error,, and take it for decision, but there has been neither an appearance nor a joinder in error, and hence the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 Ill. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-people-ill-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack