French v. Mayor of Millville
51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 349, 38 Vroom 349, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 113
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon. 37 Vroom 392.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenbukgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
French v. Mayor of Millville, 51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 349, 38 Vroom 349, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 113 (N.J. 1902).
51 A. 1109 (French v. Mayor of Millville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Public Housing Admin. v. Housing Auth. of Bogalusa
137 So. 2d 315 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1961)
State v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Company
340 P.2d 200 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1959)
Lewis v. Independent School Dist. of Austin
147 S.W.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Travelers Insurance v. Village of Wadsworth
142 N.E. 900 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1924)