French v. Herndon Drilling Company of Tulsa

1954 OK 334, 277 P.2d 138, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 701
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 30, 1954
DocketNo. 36628
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1954 OK 334 (French v. Herndon Drilling Company of Tulsa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
French v. Herndon Drilling Company of Tulsa, 1954 OK 334, 277 P.2d 138, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 701 (Okla. 1954).

Opinion

JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.

This action was brought by C. S. French against Herndon Drilling Company for damages. Judgment resulted for the defendant and plaintiff has appealed.

The motion for new trial was overruled May 10, 1954. The case was filed in this court on August 28, 1954. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the case was not filed in this court within three months after the date of the overruling of the motion for new trial and there was no order of the trial court extending the time for the appeal. The motion must be sustained.

In Roof v. Fechtel, Okl., 258 P.2d 890, we said:

“Where the petition in error with record or case made is not filed within three months after the judgment or final order made in the case and there has been no order of the trial court extending the time for appeal as provided by 12 O.S.1951 § 972, the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1954 OK 334, 277 P.2d 138, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-herndon-drilling-company-of-tulsa-okla-1954.