French v. Department of Corrections for the Massachusetts

16 F. App'x 16
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedAugust 9, 2001
Docket00-1732
StatusPublished

This text of 16 F. App'x 16 (French v. Department of Corrections for the Massachusetts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
French v. Department of Corrections for the Massachusetts, 16 F. App'x 16 (1st Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wilfred Roy French has appealed a district court judgment granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Manarite v. City of Springfield, 957 F.2d 953, 955 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 837, 113 S.Ct. 113, 121 L.Ed.2d 70 (1992). Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we affirm the district court judgment, essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum and order, dated March 28, 2000. 1

Apart from his appellate brief, French has filed a motion asking for leave to file a “supplemental exhibit.” Our review is confined to the record on appeal and we do not ordinarily consider material that was not presented to the court below. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(a). The motion is, therefore, denied. We add that, in any event, consideration of that exhibit would not affect the outcome of this appeal.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. We grant the motion of defendant-appellee Tim Hall for leave to join the brief filed by his co-defendants-appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F. App'x 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-v-department-of-corrections-for-the-massachusetts-ca1-2001.