French v. Butler

39 Mich. 79, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 209
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Marston, J.

It clearly appeared that the award was signed by two of the arbitrators in the presence of each other, but- not in the presence of the third, who signed [80]*80it at a different time and place, in the presence of one of the other two but not of both. This comes clearly within the decision in Daniels v. Ripley, 10 Mich., 237, and rendered the award invalid.

. These facts appearing and there being no dispute in reference thereto, the award should have been vacated, and it was error to render judgment thereon.

The judgment must be reversed with costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

French v. Butler, 39 Mich. 79, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 209 (Mich. 1878).

39 Mich. 79 (French v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washburn v. White
84 N.E. 106 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)