French v. Blum

430 N.E.2d 1314, 54 N.Y.2d 1017, 446 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3191
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 1981·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, Tompkins County, reinstated. The Appellate Division erred, as a matter of law, in confirming respondents’ determination reducing petitioner’s monthly grant of public assistance in disregard of the provisions of the regulations of the Department of Social Services (18 NYCRR 352.31 [d]; see Matter of Goloty v Smith, 70 AD2d 642; Matter of Hetrick v Reed, 60 AD2d 761; Matter of Badame v Berger, 55 AD2d 931).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

French v. Blum, 430 N.E.2d 1314, 54 N.Y.2d 1017, 446 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3191 (N.Y. 1981).

430 N.E.2d 1314 (French v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coville v. Blum
105 A.D.2d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Gandy v. Blum
84 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)