Fremont Emergency Services, LTD. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedOctober 11, 2022
Docket2:22-cv-01118
StatusUnknown

This text of Fremont Emergency Services, LTD. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company (Fremont Emergency Services, LTD. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fremont Emergency Services, LTD. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, (D. Nev. 2022).

Opinion

MReEnSeeS NFiEncRh R(NEeEvVadEaS B LaLr NP o. 13118) 2 8945 West Russell Road, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 3 Telephone: (702) 363-5100 Facsimile: (702) 363-5101 4 Email: rfinch@messner.com

5 LASH & GOLDBERG LLP Justin C. Fineberg (pro hac) 6 Jonathan E. Siegelaub (pro hac) Annette U. Tucker (pro hac) 7 Benjamin R. Shiekman (pro hac) 100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 1200 8 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 347-4040 9 Facsimile: (305) 347-4050 Email: jfineberg@lashgoldberg.com 10 Email: jsiegelaub@lashgoldberg.com Email: atucker@lashgoldberg.com 11 Email: bshiekman@lashgoldberg.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Fremont Emergency Services (Scherr), Ltd. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 FREMONT EMERGENCY SERVICES 15 (SCHERR), LTD.; Case No. 2:22-cv-01118-CDS-BNW 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to 18 Extend Deadlines for Plaintiff’s Response UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE and Defendants’ Reply to Defendants’ 19 COMPANY and UNITED Motion to Stay HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., 20 Defendants. 21 Plaintiff, Fremont Emergency Services (Scherr), Ltd. (hereafter, “Plaintiff”), by and 22 through its attorneys of record, and Defendants, UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company and 23 24 United Healthcare Services, Inc. (hereafter, “Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of 25 record, hereby stipulate and agree to the following: 26 1. Plaintiff stipulated to allow Defendants to respond to the Complaint [DOC 1] on or 27 before September 8, 2022. 28 2. Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss [DOC 29] on September 8, 2022. 3. The Response to Defendants’ Motion is currently due on or before October 17, 2022, per 2 the stipulation of the parties. 3 4. Thereafter, Defendants filed their Motion to Stay Discovery [DOC 40] on September 29, 4 2022. 5 5. Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Stay Discovery is due on or before October 13, 6 7 2022. Defendants’ Reply to the Motion to Stay Discovery would be due on or before 8 October 20, 2022. 9 6. Given the overlap of the briefing schedule for the Motion to Stay Discovery and the 10 Motion to Dismiss, the parties have stipulated to extend the briefing schedule on the 11 Motion to Stay, making Plaintiff’s Response due on or before October 21, 2022, and 12 Defendants’ Reply due on or before November 4, 2022. 13 / / / 14 15 / / / 16 / / / 17 / / / 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 1 7. The Motion to Stay is currently set for hearing in front of Magistrate Weksler on 2 November 14, 2022. 3 4 || Respectfully submitted, 5 || DATED this 10" day of October, 2022. DATED this 10" day of October, 2022. 6 || By: /s/ Renee M. Finch By: /s/Debra L. Spinelli Renee M. Finch, Esq. James J. Pisanelli, Esq. 7 Nevada State Bar 13118 Nevada Bar No. 4027 MESSNER REEVES LLP Debra L. Spinelli, Esq. 8 8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 300 Nevada Bar No. 9695 Las Vegas, NV 89148 PISANELLI BICE, PLLC 9 400 South □□ Street, Suite 300 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Fremont Las Vegas, NV 89101 10 Emergency Services (Scherr), Ltd. Attorneys for Defendants United 11 Justin C. Fineberg* HealthCare Insurance Company & Jonathan E. Siegelaub* United HealthCare Services 12 Annette U. Tucker* Benjamin R. Shiekman* Jeffrey S. Gleason, Esq.* 13 LASH & GOLDBERG LLP Jamie R. Kurtz, Esq.* 100 S.E. 24 Street, Suite 1200 Charlie C. Gokey, Esq.* 14 Miami, Florida 33131 ROBINS KAPLAN, LLP 800 LaSalle Avenue, Suite 2800 15 *Admitted pro hac vice Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 16 Jessica M. Pettit* ROBINS KAPLAN, LLP 17 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 18 Los Angeles, California 90067

19 *Admitted pro hac vice

20 IT IS SO ORDERED:

22 KK pr la WEED 73 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 24 DATED: October 11, 2022 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. Hinman
100 S.E. 24 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fremont Emergency Services, LTD. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fremont-emergency-services-ltd-v-unitedhealthcare-insurance-company-nvd-2022.