Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/Fremin v. Entergy New Orleans, Inc.

Fremin v. Entergy New Orleans, Inc.

938 So. 2d 62, 2006 La. LEXIS 2769, 2006 WL 2882595
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 6, 2006·No. No. 2006-CC-1700·Published

Opinion

In re Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp.;—Defendant; Applying for Supervi[63]*63sory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. E, No. 2001-06848; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2006-C-0616.

Granted in part. The judgment of the trial court holding that the “Dore Letter” is privileged is reinstated. See Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh Pierson & Talley, 513 So.2d 1138 (La.1987); Pitard v. Stillwater Transfer and Storage Co., 589 So.2d 1127 (La.App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied, 594 So.2d 1314 (La.1992). In all other respects, the application is denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would deny the writ. KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ. JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fremin v. Entergy New Orleans, Inc., 938 So. 2d 62, 2006 La. LEXIS 2769, 2006 WL 2882595 (La. 2006).

938 So. 2d 62 (Fremin v. Entergy New Orleans, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson & Talley
513 So. 2d 1138 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1987)
Pitard v. Stillwater Transfer & Storage
589 So. 2d 1127 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)