Frelin Construction Co. v. Yundt
This text of 417 F.2d 312 (Frelin Construction Co. v. Yundt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This appeal has been taken from the dismissal with prejudice of a fourth amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted.
The claim is contractual. We agree with the district court that the appellant failed, after ample opportunity to amend his complaint, adequately to allege facts which would make the appellee either an original party to the contract in suit or a party by reason of ratification of an originally unauthorized undertaking of another on his behalf.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Although Judge Van Dusen was present during the argument of the above case, he did not take uart in its decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 F.2d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frelin-construction-co-v-yundt-ca3-1969.