Freligh v. City of New York

265 A.D. 967, 38 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6776
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The notice of intention to sue complied substantially with section 394a-1.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York “with such practical certainty as to satisfy the purpose of the statute” (Denecke v. Property Collaterals, Inc., 279 N. Y. 105, 107) so as “ to give the city the opportunity to investigate' such claim.” (Schwartz v. City of New York, 250 N. Y. 332, 335.) The accident happened at the southwest corner of Vanderbilt and St. Marks avenues, in Brooklyn. The reference to premises on St. Marks avenue was as unnecessary as it was erroneous. But, in view of the small area covered by the places mentioned in the notice, the notice, when reasonably construed, accomplished the purpose of the statute. (Walden v. City of Jamestown, 178 N. Y. 213.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freligh v. City of New York, 265 A.D. 967, 38 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 967 (Freligh v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Luca v. City of New York
182 Misc. 583 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)