Freitas v. State

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 12, 2010
Docket29808
StatusPublished

This text of Freitas v. State (Freitas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freitas v. State, (haw 2010).

Opinion

NO. 29808

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAfI

MELVIN FREITAS, JR., Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant

VS.

STATE oF HAWAI‘I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee

'3’°' W 31 Snw@mz

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (S.P.P. NO. 09-1-OOlO; CR. NO. 95-lOO6) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Acoba, J., for the court1) ‘

lt appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter has not been entered by the Intermediate Court (Supp. .

see HawaiYi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)

of Appeals, 2009); see also Hawaifi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule

(2009),

36(b)(1) lT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner-

Appellant Melvin Freitas, Jr.'s application for writ of certiorari, filed August 9, 20l0, is dismissed without prejudice

to re~filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.l(a) (“No later than 90 days after the filing of the intermediate court of

judgment on appeal or dismissal order, any party may

appeals’

Nakayama, Acting C.J., Ac0ba, and Circuit Judge Sakamoto, in place of Moon,

1 The courts

Recktenwald, JJ.,

Duffy, and ' C.J., recused.

apply in writing to the supreme court for a writ of

certiorari.”).

DATED:

Melvin Freitas,

appellant, pro se, application.

Jr., petitioner/petitioner-

Honolulu, HawaFi, August l2, 20l0. FOR THE COURTZ

/9`°*"`“

Ass0ciate Justice

on the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Freitas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freitas-v-state-haw-2010.