Freitag v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freitag v. State

443 S.W.3d 728, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1080, 2014 WL 4832271

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2014·No. No. ED 100272·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Isaiah Freitag appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Isaiah Freitag appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Freitag v. State, 443 S.W.3d 728, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1080, 2014 WL 4832271 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

443 S.W.3d 728 (Freitag v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.