Freitag v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Freitag v. Hartford Fire Insurance

248 A.D. 946, 291 N.Y.S. 189, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8160

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 9, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Whatever the nature of this action is, we find that all acts complained of occurred more than six years before the time of the commencement of the action, and if fraud is the basis of the action, the fraud was manifestly known to the plaintiff from its inception. All concur. (The order dismisses the complaint in an action for malicious prosecution.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Whatever the nature of this action is, we find that all acts complained of occurred more than six years before the time of the commencement of the action, and if fraud is the basis of the action, the fraud was manifestly known to the plaintiff from its inception. All concur. (The order dismisses the complaint in an action for malicious prosecution.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Freitag v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 248 A.D. 946, 291 N.Y.S. 189, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 946 (Freitag v. Hartford Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.