Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Freire v. State

Freire v. State

199 So. 3d 499, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13213, 2016 WL 4547995
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 2016·No. No. 4D16-1434·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient motion within thirty days of this opinion, but only if he can do so in good faith. See Oquendo v. State, 2 So.3d 1001, 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 762 (Fla.2007)); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f).

GROSS, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freire v. State, 199 So. 3d 499, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13213, 2016 WL 4547995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

199 So. 3d 499 (Freire v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oquendo v. State
2 So. 3d 1001 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)