Freimer v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Freimer v. City of New York

279 A.D. 1084, 112 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5914

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 1084 (Freimer v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freimer v. City of New York, 279 A.D. 1084, 112 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Respondent suffered a back injury on June 8, 1951; was confined to hospitals for six days and thereafter to her home, except for visits to a doctor and a physiotherapist. On August 30, 1951, she suffered the death of her husband. On September 10, 1951, she consulted her attorney. On November 29, 1951, the within application was made, it being stated that the delay in making the application was occasioned by the delay in obtaining medical reports. There is no showing that the respondent was mentally or physically incapacitated and that failure to serve the notice in time was by reason of such disability. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent suffered a back injury on June 8, 1951; was confined to hospitals for six days and thereafter to her home, except for visits to a doctor and a physiotherapist. On August 30, 1951, she suffered the death of her husband. On September 10, 1951, she consulted her attorney. On November 29, 1951, the within application was made, it being stated that the delay in making the application was occasioned by the delay in obtaining medical reports. There is no showing that the respondent was mentally or physically incapacitated and that failure to serve the notice in time was by reason of such disability. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D. 1084, 112 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freimer-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack