Freiman v. Hirsch

441 So. 2d 1146, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24242
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 15, 1983
DocketNo. 83-837
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 441 So. 2d 1146 (Freiman v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freiman v. Hirsch, 441 So. 2d 1146, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24242 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The complaint does not allege a basis for subjecting the defendant-appellant Marvin A.H. Freiman, a New York attorney, to service under the Florida long-arm statute, and his unrebutted affidavit affirmatively shows that no such basis exists. Investors Associates, Inc. v. Moss, 441 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Nichols v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc., 302 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person is therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albertson v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
441 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 So. 2d 1146, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freiman-v-hirsch-fladistctapp-1983.