Freiman v. Hirsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Freiman v. Hirsch

441 So. 2d 1146, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24242

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 1983·No. No. 83-837·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The complaint does not allege a basis for subjecting the defendant-appellant Marvin A.H. Freiman, a New York attorney, to service under the Florida long-arm statute, and his unrebutted affidavit affirmatively shows that no such basis exists. Investors Associates, Inc. v. Moss, 441 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Nichols v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc., 302 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person is therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The complaint does not allege a basis for subjecting the defendant-appellant Marvin A.H. Freiman, a New York attorney, to service under the Florida long-arm statute, and his unrebutted affidavit affirmatively shows that no such basis exists. Investors Associates, Inc. v. Moss, 441 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Nichols v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc., 302 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person is therefore reversed.

Freiman v. Hirsch, 441 So. 2d 1146, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24242 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

441 So. 2d 1146 (Freiman v. Hirsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related