Freiman v. Hirsch
This text of 441 So. 2d 1146 (Freiman v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint does not allege a basis for subjecting the defendant-appellant Marvin A.H. Freiman, a New York attorney, to service under the Florida long-arm statute, and his unrebutted affidavit affirmatively shows that no such basis exists. Investors Associates, Inc. v. Moss, 441 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Nichols v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc., 302 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person is therefore reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 So. 2d 1146, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freiman-v-hirsch-fladistctapp-1983.