Freilich, H. v. SEPTA
This text of Freilich, H. v. SEPTA (Freilich, H. v. SEPTA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
HAYLEY FREILICH, : No. 245 EAL 2023 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA : TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, : : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:
(1) Does 42 Pa.C.S § 8528(b) violate [Petitioner’s] right to a remedy in Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution under the facts of this case, where [Petitioner’s] recovery will be consumed by costs, fees, and insurance reimbursement claims?
(2) Does 42 Pa.C.S § 8528(b) violate [Petitioner’s] right to a jury trial in Article I, Section 6 of the Pennsylvania Constitution under the facts of this case, where [Petitioner’s] recovery will be consumed by costs, fees, and insurance reimbursement claims?
In addition, the parties are DIRECTED to address the following question:
If the Court concludes that the limitation of damages set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 8528 is unconstitutional, is Section 8528 severable from the limited waiver of sovereign immunity set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. §8522(a)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freilich, H. v. SEPTA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freilich-h-v-septa-pa-2024.