Freidenreich v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
531 So. 2d 349, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1911, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3594, 1988 WL 81842
Opinion
Finding that the ambiguity as to the intended amount to be utilized under the term “original cost” in an insurance policy creates a genuine issue of material fact, we reverse the summary judgment and the final judgments taxing costs and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); Sandron Corp. v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 360 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freidenreich v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 531 So. 2d 349, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1911, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3594, 1988 WL 81842 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
531 So. 2d 349 (Freidenreich v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. Morris
475 So. 2d 666 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Sandron Corp. v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.
360 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)