Freiberger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

143 Misc. 164, 255 N.Y.S. 710, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1397
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 Misc. 164 (Freiberger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freiberger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 143 Misc. 164, 255 N.Y.S. 710, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The word “ transport ” means to carry or convey from one place to another. (Funk & Wagnalls’ New Standard Diet.) The title of clause 3 of the defendant’s bond, viz., “ Messenger Robbery Coverage ” (italics ours) indicates that the word “ transport ” was used in the bond in that sense. In our opinion the assured was not transporting the money from his premises merely because it was in his possession at the time he left his place of business and went to the barber shop, in the absence of evidence that he was taking the money from his place of business with the intention of leaving it at some specific place.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O. K. Express Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
10 A.D.2d 203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 Misc. 164, 255 N.Y.S. 710, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freiberger-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-nyappterm-1932.