Freiberg v. Stoddard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Freiberg v. Stoddard

28 A. 1111, 161 Pa. 259, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 682

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 23, 1894

DocketAppeal, No. 442

StatusPublished

Cited by21 cases

This text of 28 A. 1111 (Freiberg v. Stoddard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freiberg v. Stoddard, 28 A. 1111, 161 Pa. 259, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 682 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We concur in the conclusions reached by the learned master and the court below. If at the time of the assignment the plaintiffs’ notes had been found by the assignee uncollected, he should have returned them. If a draft or bond or a specific package of money received in paj^ment of the notes had been found among the assets coming into his hands, it should have been turned over to the plaintiffs. But neither the notes, nor any security nor sum of money received in payment of them came into his hands. He holds nothing which he or the plaintiffs can identify with the notes or trace as a payment of them. This is clearly pointed out in the opinion of the learned judge of the court below, and we think the case may very properly be affirmed upon his opinion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We concur in the conclusions reached by the learned master and the court below. If at the time of the assignment the plaintiffs’ notes had been found by the assignee uncollected, he should have returned them. If a draft or bond or a specific package of money received in paj^ment of the notes had been found among the assets coming into his hands, it should have been turned over to the plaintiffs. But neither the notes, nor any security nor sum of money received in payment of them came into his hands. He holds nothing which he or the plaintiffs can identify with the notes or trace as a payment of them. This is clearly pointed out in the opinion of the learned judge of the court below, and we think the case may very properly be affirmed upon his opinion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A. 1111, 161 Pa. 259, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freiberg-v-stoddard-pa-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack