Freeze v. Veterans Administration Medical Center
This text of 174 F. App'x 783 (Freeze v. Veterans Administration Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles L. Freeze appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to recuse and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Freeze v. Veterans Admin. Med. Ctr., No. CA-05-219-1-FWB (M.D.N.C. June 21, 2005; Dec. 29, 2005). We deny Freeze’s motions to recuse the district court judge, to charge the district court judge with obstruction of justice, and for an en bane hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 F. App'x 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeze-v-veterans-administration-medical-center-ca4-2006.