Freeze v. United States
This text of Freeze v. United States (Freeze v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2573
CHARLES L. FREEZE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Substituted for defendant, Dr. Donald Durham Volkmer; DONALD DURHAM VOLKMER, DR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-596-1)
Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles L. Freeze, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles L. Freeze appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil complaint and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Freeze v. United States, No. CA-03-596-1
(M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2004; Dec. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freeze v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeze-v-united-states-ca4-2005.