Freeze v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Freeze v. United States

131 F. App'x 950

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2005·No. No. 04-2573·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles L. Freeze appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Freeze v. United States, No. CA-03-596-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2004; Dec. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles L. Freeze appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Freeze v. United States, No. CA-03-596-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2004; Dec. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Freeze v. United States, 131 F. App'x 950 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

131 F. App'x 950 (Freeze v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related