Freeze v. State

875 So. 2d 731, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8308, 2004 WL 1284158
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freeze v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 861 So. 2d 1234
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 2004·No. No. 2D03-1615·Published

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Terry Freeze, a committed person under part V of chapter 394,' Florida Statutes (2000), entitled “Involuntary Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators” (the Act), seeks a writ of habeas corpus ordering his immediate release from confinement. Alternatively, he seeks a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to comply with section 394.918(3) of the Act.

This case is governed by our holding in Allen v. State, 873 So.2d 576 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus and grant the petition for writ of mandamus. We direct the circuit court to hold a limited probable cause hearing pursuant to section 394.918(3), with counsel representing Mr. Freeze as mandated, unless Mr. Freeze has been afforded such a hearing in the last calendar year.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied; petition for writ of mandamus granted.

SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeze v. State, 875 So. 2d 731, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8308, 2004 WL 1284158 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

875 So. 2d 731 (Freeze v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. State
873 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)