Freeman v. Wilson

113 S.E. 36, 28 Ga. App. 720
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 11, 1922
Docket13360
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 36 (Freeman v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman v. Wilson, 113 S.E. 36, 28 Ga. App. 720 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence amply supported the verdict. The several assignments of error upon the excerpts from the charge of the court, and upon the failure to charge certain principles of law, when the charge of the court is read in its entirety, are without merit. In view of the issue raised by the pleadings, and the contract sued upon, for no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in its rulings upon objections raised to the admissibility of evidence. , The defendant has had a legal trial of his case, the judge trying the case has approved the verdict, and for no reason pointed out in the record was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 36, 28 Ga. App. 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-wilson-gactapp-1922.