Freeman v. Watkins

52 Ark. 446
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 446 (Freeman v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman v. Watkins, 52 Ark. 446 (Ark. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

attachment Sales. Attachment sales are, by the terms of the statute; subject to confirmation by the court. The contract of sale is not complete until the bid of the purchaser is accepted by the court, and until acceptance there cambe no enforcement of the contract by either party. The purchaser cannot, therefore, be compelled to comply with the terms of sale by payment of the purchase money, until his bid has been accepted by the court. Freeman on Ex., sec. 304; Bell v. Green, 38 Ark., 78; Greer v. Powell, 3 Met. (Ky.), 124.

There had been no confirmation in this case when the action to collect the purchase money was brought, and it was, therefore, premature.

If the plaintiff shall move a confirmation of the sale, the defendant can raise the other questions argued by him, in that proceeding. When the sale is confirmed the plaintiff can renew his action to recover the purchase money.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quellmalz Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Day
201 S.W. 125 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
Kenady v. Gilkey
98 S.W. 969 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1906)
Snell v. Cummins
54 S.W. 342 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ark. 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-watkins-ark-1889.