Freeman v. United States
This text of Freeman v. United States (Freeman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8451
NORMAN FREEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; R. BLOCKER, Medical Doctor; ROSARIO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (9:07-cv-03431-TLW)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 2, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Norman Freeman appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971),
and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm the order of the district court. See
Freeman v. United States, No. 9:07-cv-03431-TLW (D.S.C. Oct. 31,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freeman v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-united-states-ca4-2009.