Freeman v. State
This text of 171 Tex. Crim. 606 (Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction is for aggravated assault upon a police officer; the punishment, confinement in jail for one year.
The record contains no statement of facts of the evidence adduced upon the trial and there are no formal bills of exception.
[607]*607The claims of error in the refusal of requested charges and the overruling of objections to the charge as given cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts. Hankins v. State, 163 Tex. Cr. Rep. 553, 294 S.W. 2d 840; Lackey v. State, 318 S.W. 2d 646 and Fountain v. State, 342 S.W. 2d 587.
All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 Tex. Crim. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-state-texcrimapp-1962.