Freeman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freeman v. State

406 S.W.3d 489, 2013 WL 4419419, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 955

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 20, 2013·No. No. ED 98904·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Freeman appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-[490] conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Freeman appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-[490] conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Freeman v. State, 406 S.W.3d 489, 2013 WL 4419419, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 955 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

406 S.W.3d 489 (Freeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.