Freeman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freeman v. State

178 S.W.3d 548, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2005 WL 1670627

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freeman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 911 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 19, 2005·No. WD 64144·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Carl E. Freeman was found guilty of voluntary manslaugh *549 ter, Section 565.023, 1 and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Freeman now appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Carl E. Freeman was found guilty of voluntary manslaugh *549 ter, Section 565.023, 1 and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Freeman now appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Freeman v. State, 178 S.W.3d 548, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2005 WL 1670627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

178 S.W.3d 548 (Freeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.