Freeman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freeman v. State

178 S.W.3d 548, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2005 WL 1670627

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 19, 2005

DocketWD 64144

StatusPublished

This text of 178 S.W.3d 548 (Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeman v. State, 178 S.W.3d 548, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2005 WL 1670627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Carl E. Freeman was found guilty of voluntary manslaugh *549 ter, Section 565.023, 1 and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Freeman now appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Carl E. Freeman was found guilty of voluntary manslaugh *549 ter, Section 565.023, 1 and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Freeman now appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 S.W.3d 548, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2005 WL 1670627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-state-moctapp-2005.