Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Freeman v. State

Freeman v. State

174 So. 3d 1104, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13899, 2015 WL 5456718
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 18, 2015
DocketNo. 5D14-3055
StatusPublished

This text of 174 So. 3d 1104 (Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman v. State, 174 So. 3d 1104, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13899, 2015 WL 5456718 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Limited, boilerplate motions for judgment of acquittal, which are of a technical and pro-forma nature, are inadequate to preserve a sufficiency of evidence claim for appellate review. Brooks v. State, 762 So.2d 879, 895 (FIa.2000). Relief, if any, must come in a timely and sufficiently pled motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. State
762 So. 2d 879 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 3d 1104, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13899, 2015 WL 5456718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.