Freeman v. State

764 So. 2d 883, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10136, 2000 WL 1140445
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 2000
DocketNo. 4D99-3617
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 764 So. 2d 883 (Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Freeman v. State, 764 So. 2d 883, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10136, 2000 WL 1140445 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the Defendant’s probation and affirm. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order revoking the Defendant’s probation and setting forth the conditions that it found were violated, we remand solely for the purpose of entering such an order. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018, 1018-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Glendon v. State, 669 So.2d 1148, 1148-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

DELL, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nationsbanc Mortg. Corp. v. GARDENS NORTH CONDO. ASSOC., INC.
764 So. 2d 883 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 So. 2d 883, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10136, 2000 WL 1140445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.