Freeman v. State
This text of 764 So. 2d 883 (Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the Defendant’s probation and affirm. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order revoking the Defendant’s probation and setting forth the conditions that it found were violated, we remand solely for the purpose of entering such an order. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018, 1018-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Glendon v. State, 669 So.2d 1148, 1148-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
764 So. 2d 883, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10136, 2000 WL 1140445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.