Freeman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Freeman v. State

648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 313, 1995 WL 18391

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1669

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 648 So. 2d 326 (Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeman v. State, 648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 313, 1995 WL 18391 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s brief and the record of his application for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, we elect to affirm pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). Although we do agree that the lower court erred by ordering that it would not entertain a motion for rehearing, our review of appellant’s brief and the record convinces us that, in this ease, the error was harmless.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s brief and the record of his application for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, we elect to affirm pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). Although we do agree that the lower court erred by ordering that it would not entertain a motion for rehearing, our review of appellant’s brief and the record convinces us that, in this ease, the error was harmless.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

648 So. 2d 326, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 313, 1995 WL 18391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack