Freeman v. Skillman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Freeman v. Skillman

99 So. 2d 630

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 11, 1957

DocketNo. 108

StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 2d 630 (Freeman v. Skillman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeman v. Skillman, 99 So. 2d 630 (Fla. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

STEPHENSON, Associate Judge.

By petition for certiorari, the employer and carrier seek to quash and set aside the order of the Full Commission affirming and ratifying the order of the Deputy Commissioner allowing disability compensation to claimant.

The point here for review resolves itself into whether or not there was competent substantial testimony offered to the Deputy Commissioner which would warrant his granting disability benefits on the basis of a change in the claimant’s condition under Section 440.28, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. From a careful review of the record, we find there was competent substantial evidence to support the findings of the Deputy Commissioner and the order of the Florida Industrial Commission.

The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEPHENSON, Associate Judge.

By petition for certiorari, the employer and carrier seek to quash and set aside the order of the Full Commission affirming and ratifying the order of the Deputy Commissioner allowing disability compensation to claimant.

The point here for review resolves itself into whether or not there was competent substantial testimony offered to the Deputy Commissioner which would warrant his granting disability benefits on the basis of a change in the claimant’s condition under Section 440.28, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. From a careful review of the record, we find there was competent substantial evidence to support the findings of the Deputy Commissioner and the order of the Florida Industrial Commission.

The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 So. 2d 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-skillman-fladistctapp-1957.