Freeman v. Rothrock
This text of 662 S.E.2d 904 (Freeman v. Rothrock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Randy B. FREEMAN, Employee
v.
J.L. ROTHROCK, Employer and
North American Speciality, Carrier Aequicap Claims Services, Inc. (Formerly Claims Control, Inc.).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jay A. Gervasi, Jr., Greensboro, for Freeman.
*905 Joy H. Brewer, Ginny P. Lanier, Cary, for Rothrock, et al.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 657 S.E.2d 389.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 10th day of April 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
Accordingly, the new brief of the Plaintiff shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
662 S.E.2d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-rothrock-nc-2008.