Freeman v. Prince Leasing Corp.
49 A.D.3d 455, 853 N.Y.2d 517
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The issue that plaintiff failed to establish she had suffered a serious injury, as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d), is not properly before us. No appeal lies from denial of a motion for [456] reargument (see Trexler v Kahanovitz, 41 AD3d 161, 162 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freeman v. Prince Leasing Corp., 49 A.D.3d 455, 853 N.Y.2d 517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 455 (Freeman v. Prince Leasing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kitchen v. Diakhate
68 A.D.3d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)