Freeman v. Peacock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Freeman v. Peacock

149 S.W. 259, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 871

DecidedMay 8, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.W. 259 (Freeman v. Peacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeman v. Peacock, 149 S.W. 259, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 871 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

JENKINS, J.

This is a companion case to Freeman v. Nathan, 149 S. W. 248, this day decided by this court. The fire that destroyed appellee’s building was communicated from the buildings of Nathan. The cases were consolidated and tried together in the district court. For the reasons stated in the Nathan Case, as well as for the further reason that the contributory negligence of Nathan, if any had been shown, would not bar a recovery by Peacock for injury suffered by him on account of the negligence of appellant, the judgment of the trial court herein is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JENKINS, J.

This is a companion case to Freeman v. Nathan, 149 S. W. 248, this day decided by this court. The fire that destroyed appellee’s building was communicated from the buildings of Nathan. The cases were consolidated and tried together in the district court. For the reasons stated in the Nathan Case, as well as for the further reason that the contributory negligence of Nathan, if any had been shown, would not bar a recovery by Peacock for injury suffered by him on account of the negligence of appellant, the judgment of the trial court herein is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.W. 259, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-peacock-texapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack