Freeman v. Nichols

116 Mass. 309, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 93
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 21, 1874·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

An unconditional delivery of goods sold for cash is a waiver of any condition in the sale, and the seller cannot afterwards assert a title to the goods. Upton v. Sturbridge Cotton Mills, 111 Mass. 446. Goodwin v. Boston & Lowell Railroad, Ib. 487. Haskins v. Warren, 115 Mass. 514. The evidence at the trial tended to prove a sale for cash, and a delivery without condition. The instruction given to the jury implied that some other evidence of waiver was necessary to prevent the maintenance of the action. Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. Nichols, 116 Mass. 309, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 93 (Mass. 1874).

116 Mass. 309 (Freeman v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehmann v. People's Furniture Co.
1914 OK 386 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Wadhams v. Balfour
51 P. 642 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1898)
Freeport Stone Co. v. Carey's Adm'r
26 S.E. 183 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1896)
Johnson—Brinkman Commission Co. v. Central Bank
22 S.W. 813 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Oester v. Sitlington
21 S.W. 820 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Thaxter v. Foster
26 N.E. 434 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Fishback v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.
22 N.W. 244 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1885)