Freeman v. Murray

Third Circuit

Freeman v. Murray

37 F. App'x 49

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 18, 2002

DocketNo. 01-3740

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 F. App'x 49 (Freeman v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeman v. Murray, 37 F. App'x 49 (3d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Anneke Freeman, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of each of the defendants and against plaintiff Freeman in the civil rights action she filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We will affirm.

Inasmuch as we write only for the parties, we need not recite the factual or procedural background of this dispute. We have reviewed the thorough and thoughtful Memorandum which the district court filed on August 30, 2001. We believe that that Memorandum adequately addresses all of the issues plaintiff has presented on appeal, and little can be gained by attempting to add to the discussion the district court has already set forth explaining the reasons for granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Accordingly, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s Memorandum of August 30, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Anneke Freeman, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of each of the defendants and against plaintiff Freeman in the civil rights action she filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We will affirm.

Inasmuch as we write only for the parties, we need not recite the factual or procedural background of this dispute. We have reviewed the thorough and thoughtful Memorandum which the district court filed on August 30, 2001. We believe that that Memorandum adequately addresses all of the issues plaintiff has presented on appeal, and little can be gained by attempting to add to the discussion the district court has already set forth explaining the reasons for granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Accordingly, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s Memorandum of August 30, 2001.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F. App'x 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-murray-ca3-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack