Freeman v. McCann
This text of 37 Ala. 714 (Freeman v. McCann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
R. W. WALKER, J.
We are constrained to reverse this judgment. The words “administrator'of all and singular the goods and chattels, rights and credits, of Christopher P. McCann, deceased,” which follow the name of the plaintiff in the summons, and in the margin or caption .of [716]*716tbe complaint, must be treated as descriptio persones ; and;': tbe suit must be regarded as the suit of the plaintiff as an-, individual, not as an administrator. — Agee v. Williams, 27 Ala. 644; Crimm v. Crawford, 29 Ala. 623, (628.) The only cause of action proven, was one in favor of C. P. McCann in his life-time and this could not authorize a recovery by; the plaintiff, when suing in his individual-! character.
Judgment reversed,- and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Ala. 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-mccann-ala-1861.