Freeman v. Masters
This text of 1932 OK 586 (Freeman v. Masters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This- appeal presents the question whether or not lands allotted to a full-blood Chickasaw Indian, descended to full-blood heirs o-f an heir of the allottee, are subject to sale by order of the county court, In administration proceedings upon the estate of the heir of the allottee, for the payment of debts contracted by such heir in his lifetime and funeral expenses.
The county court held that it is, and upon appeal to the district court the holding and order of the county court decreeing the -sale of such land was reversed and the land held not subject to sale for such purpose, and claimants appeal to this court.
The question has been definitely decided by this court against the contention of plaintiffs in error in Boyd v. Weer (1926) 124 *9 Okla. 91, 253 P. 988. See, also, Kiel v. Baker (1923) 91 Okla. 128, 216 P. 640.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1932 OK 586, 16 P.2d 563, 161 Okla. 8, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-masters-okla-1932.