Freeman v. Lyle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Freeman v. Lyle

88 S.E. 714, 17 Ga. App. 818, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 958

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 21, 1916

Docket6725

StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 714 (Freeman v. Lyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freeman v. Lyle, 88 S.E. 714, 17 Ga. App. 818, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 958 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The facts stated in the bill of exceptions do not show that the trial judge abused his discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance of the motion for a new trial in the case.

2. The lower court having certified that no proper brief of the evidence was filed, or prepared and tendered, when the motion for a new trial ivas called for hearing in its regular order, this court can not say that the dismissal of the motion was error. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

1. The facts stated in the bill of exceptions do not show that the trial judge abused his discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance of the motion for a new trial in the case.

2. The lower court having certified that no proper brief of the evidence was filed, or prepared and tendered, when the motion for a new trial ivas called for hearing in its regular order, this court can not say that the dismissal of the motion was error. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 S.E. 714, 17 Ga. App. 818, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-lyle-gactapp-1916.