Freeman v. Kinworthy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freeman v. Kinworthy

804 S.W.2d 814, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 1991 WL 22326

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 26, 1991·No. No. 57818·Published

Opinion

[815]*815ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this automobile accident case, plaintiff appeals a $25,000.00 jury verdict in his favor. He contends the damages he was awarded were inadequate.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[815]*815ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this automobile accident case, plaintiff appeals a $25,000.00 jury verdict in his favor. He contends the damages he was awarded were inadequate.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Freeman v. Kinworthy, 804 S.W.2d 814, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 1991 WL 22326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

804 S.W.2d 814 (Freeman v. Kinworthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.