Freeman v. Hukill
This text of 4 Blackf. 9 (Freeman v. Hukill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A JUDGMENT by' default was set aside by consent of parties, on the condition that the defendant should, within 20 days, give sufficient bail to the sheriff, or that execution should issue on the judgment. Held, that this proceeding was incorrect.
It was ordered by the Circuit Court, that a non-resident plaintiff should give security for costs within 20 days, or that the suit should be dismissed. Held, that the Court, (the security not having been given according to the order,) might permit the plaintiff, at the next term,, to file the bond for costs.
Pleas in abatement must be filed on or before the day on which the cause is docketed, at the first term at which the cause stands for trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Blackf. 9, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-hukill-ind-1835.