Freeman v. Hertzoff
This text of 179 A.D.2d 363 (Freeman v. Hertzoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In connection with the claim that defendant New York University (NYU) negligently supervised its premises, the parties are entitled to discovery for a reasonable period prior to the fire which, it is alleged, was caused by NYU’s students dropping incendiary material from their dormitory onto a [364]*364neighboring building. The three year period permitted here is reasonable (Matos v City of New York, 78 AD2d 834). For the purposes of discovery, a history of the discarding of refuse by NYU students onto the neighboring roof, and the fire mar-shall’s report which attributes the cause to "probably careless discard of smoking material” sufficiently establishes relevancy.
We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-hertzoff-nyappdiv-1992.